The issue was that while it was possible to create armour which could stop bullets, it was increasingly heavy and inflexible, and also increasingly expensive to purchase. Armour from the late 1400's on was "proofed" by firing a shot from a handheld firearm into it, allowing the purchaser to have a visible sign that the armour was capable of stopping a bullet. Historically, knights were protected from firearms. The aim isn't to defeat your modern foe militarily, it's to demoralise them into giving up and going away exactly as the VC managed. Note that all of this is stuff that could feasibly be done by knights, but it doesn't look much like the way knights would historically have fought. Depending on the temperament of your enemy you might consider infiltrating knights into their cities to conduct terror attacks, although this risks hardening their resolve against you. If the modern enemy has embedded reporters, wage media warfare - expose the embedded media to horrors, ensure they see the full suffering of their own troops and your most innocent civilians and hope to suppress the appetite for war in the enemy's homeland. Conduct psychological warfare - if the enemy's patrols just disappear without trace, they get spooked. Be able to mingle seamlessly in with civilians. Fight in terrain that works for you and against the modern army - dense forest, tunnels. Fight on home turf and use local knowledge. Now you have first blood, and some guns and ammo of your own, maybe grenades. Carry out a sneak attack against a small enemy base. Avoid an open pitched battle, it would be suicide.ĭitch the armour, take a dagger instead of a sword. What you don't do is take on the modern army on their terms, or even the terms a knight would be used to. Ask the Viet Cong how they held off the most powerful superpower in the world.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |